To Compare Post-Extraction Use of a Novel Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Post-operative Mouth Rinse and Daily Use EDTA Mouth Rinse and Standard 0.12% Chlorhexidine (CHX) Post-operative Mouth Rinse and Daily Use Essential Oil (EO) Mouth Rinse.
NCT07191262
This study is recruiting at 1 US site in 1 state, according to its ClinicalTrials.gov record last updated .
Summary
This study will compare commercially available, commonly used mouth rinses (0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) vs. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) for immediate post-operative and daily antiseptic use after tooth extraction and ridge preservation grafting followed by daily use of commercially available an essential oil (EO) mouthrinse and EDTA mouthrinse.
Shortened from the sponsor's brief summary. View official record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Conditions studied
- Extraction Sites After Removal and Bone Replacement Grafting at Extraction Sockets of Dentally Hopeless Single-rooted Teeth
Eligibility basics and study details
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Last updated on ClinicalTrials.gov
- March 20, 2026
These are the basic criteria only. The full inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official record, and the study team decides who can take part.
US recruiting sites
Alabama · 1
- University of Alabama at Birmingham · Birmingham, AL
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data processed . Recruiting US sites filtered by distance and site status; summaries shortened.