Neurobehavioral Signatures of Sign- and Goal-Tracking in Emerging Adults: Translation of a Preclinical Model
NCT07094061
This study is recruiting at 1 US site in 1 state, according to its ClinicalTrials.gov record last updated .
Summary
This study seeks to understand individual differences in personality, brain function, and behavior. Study hypothesis: - A stronger sign-tracking bias will be associated with a bottom-up processing style characterized by less adaptive attentional- and impulse-control as well as hyperactive reward processing, whereas a stronger goal-tracking bias will be associated with a top-down processing style characterized by strong attentional- and impulse-control as well as normative reward processing.
Shortened from the sponsor's brief summary. View official record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Conditions studied
- Substance Use
- Healthy
Eligibility basics and study details
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Ages
- 18 to 22 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Last updated on ClinicalTrials.gov
- June 10, 2026
These are the basic criteria only. The full inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official record, and the study team decides who can take part.
US recruiting sites
Michigan · 1
- Rachel Upjohn Building · Ann Arbor, MI
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data processed . Recruiting US sites filtered by distance and site status; summaries shortened.