Patient Reported Experiences With Sparing External Oblique Fascia Vs Standard Inguinal Orchiectomy
NCT06828185
This study is recruiting at 2 US sites in 1 state, according to its ClinicalTrials.gov record last updated .
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference in patient-reported postoperative outcomes between two standard-of-care surgical techniques for radical orchiectomy (inguinal orchiectomy versus external oblique fascia sparing orchiectomy) for treatment of patients with suspected testicular malignancy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does sparing the external oblique fascia during orchiectomy reduce pain after surgery? Is there a difference in narcotic consumption after surgery? Is there a difference in neuropathic pain after surgery?
Shortened from the sponsor's brief summary. View official record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Conditions studied
- Testicular Cancer
Eligibility basics and study details
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Sponsor
- Loma Linda University
- Last updated on ClinicalTrials.gov
- November 10, 2026
These are the basic criteria only. The full inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official record, and the study team decides who can take part.
US recruiting sites
California · 2
- Loma Linda University · Loma Linda, CA
- University of Southern California · Los Angeles, CA
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data processed . Recruiting US sites filtered by distance and site status; summaries shortened.