Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery
NCT06815367
This study is recruiting at 1 US site in 1 state, according to its ClinicalTrials.gov record last updated .
Summary
Both BFR and intermittent pneumatic compression are purported to decrease symptoms associated with exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) that cause delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Blood flow restriction relies on applying pressurized cuffs to the most proximal portion of the limb. Another form of recovery often relied upon is pneumatic compression.
Shortened from the sponsor's brief summary. View official record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Conditions studied
- Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness
Eligibility basics and study details
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Sponsor
- University of Southern California
- Last updated on ClinicalTrials.gov
- March 30, 2026
These are the basic criteria only. The full inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official record, and the study team decides who can take part.
US recruiting sites
California · 1
- University of Southern California · Los Angeles, CA
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data processed . Recruiting US sites filtered by distance and site status; summaries shortened.