Skip to content
Trial Eligibility
Menu

Is Methenamine Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection After Midurethral Sling as Effective as Antibiotic Prophylaxis?

NCT06810687

This study is recruiting at 1 US site in 1 state, according to its ClinicalTrials.gov record last updated .

Summary

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects at least 40% of women in the United States. Synthetic polypropylene mid-urethral slings (MUS) are the gold standard treatment for SUI. Post-operative urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most common complications after MUS placement. Some studies have demonstrated that MUS placement can increase the risk of UTI up to 21-34%. Post-operative UTI can lead to significant healthcare and patient burden. This additional burden further contributes to an estimated annual cost of $1.6 billion for UTI management in the United States.

Shortened from the sponsor's brief summary. View official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)

Eligibility basics and study details

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Ages
18 to 100 years
Sex
Female
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Sponsor
Atlantic Health System
Last updated on ClinicalTrials.gov
February 7, 2025

These are the basic criteria only. The full inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official record, and the study team decides who can take part.

US recruiting sites

New Jersey · 1

  • Atlantic Health · Morristown, NJ

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data processed . Recruiting US sites filtered by distance and site status; summaries shortened.