Suture Repair vs Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia
NCT05599750
This study is recruiting at 4 US sites in 4 states, according to its ClinicalTrials.gov record last updated .
Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the difference in quality of life at one year postoperatively for patients undergoing incisional hernia repair with mesh versus suture repair using modern techniques. The main question it aims to answer are: • Determine if primary suture repair is non-inferior to mesh repair for incisional hernias 2-6cm with respect to quality of life using the HerQLes summary score at one year postoperatively.
Shortened from the sponsor's brief summary. View official record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Conditions studied
- Incisional Hernia
Eligibility basics and study details
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Sponsor
- Clayton Petro
- Last updated on ClinicalTrials.gov
- January 7, 2026
These are the basic criteria only. The full inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official record, and the study team decides who can take part.
US recruiting sites
Florida · 1
- University of Florida · Gainesville, FL
Illinois · 1
- Northwestern · Chicago, IL
Ohio · 1
- Cleveland Clinic Main Campus · Cleveland, OH
Tennessee · 1
- Vanderbilt University · Nashville, TN
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data processed . Recruiting US sites filtered by distance and site status; summaries shortened.